Skip to main content

Runtime worked example

Calculation laboratory

How Long Will a 1,000 Wh Power Station Run a 100 W Load?

The ideal 10-hour division is a ceiling. Applying only an 85% AC-efficiency factor gives the common 8 hours 30 minutes; keeping an additional 10% reserve lowers this plan to 7 hours 39 minutes.

By Tollica editorial team7 min readPublished 2026-09-21

Use this guide to

Understand why nominal Wh divided by load W is only an upper bound.

Use the calculator to

Substitute the real battery window, load and conversion assumptions.

Short answer

About 7 h 39 min with the stated assumptions. The often-quoted 8 h 30 min estimate applies the 85% efficiency factor but uses the full battery. This plan also keeps a 10% reserve, leaving 900 Wh for a 117.65 W battery-side demand.

Nominal capacity

1,000 Wh

The battery label used by the scenario.

Common shortcut

8 h 30 min

85% conversion factor with no reserve.

Battery demand

117.65 W

For a 100 W AC load at 85% efficiency.

Estimated runtime

7 h 39 min

7.65 hours until the selected reserve is reached.

AC runtime estimate
runtime = [capacity Wh × retention × (start% − reserve%)] ÷ (load W ÷ AC efficiency + overhead W)

Percentages are decimal fractions in the calculation. The formula keeps battery availability and battery-side demand visible as separate quantities.

Runtime curve

A modest load change moves runtime by hours

The battery and loss assumptions stay fixed while AC load changes. This isolates the inverse relationship between demand and runtime.

Fixed assumptions for this comparison

  • 1,000 Wh nominal capacity
  • 100% retention
  • 100% → 10% operating window
  • 85% AC efficiency
  • 0 W station overhead
  • Only AC load changes
  1. ScenarioResultInterpretation
  2. 75 W load

    10 h 12 min

    88.24 W average battery demand at 85% AC efficiency.

  3. 100 W load

    7 h 39 min

    117.65 W average battery demand at 85% AC efficiency.

  4. 150 W load

    5 h 6 min

    176.47 W average battery demand at 85% AC efficiency.

Real inverter efficiency may also change with load, so the curve is a controlled model comparison rather than a product guarantee.

Runtime envelope

Report a planning range, not false precision

The engine result of 7 h 39 min is the exact answer to the entered model, but the real input power and conversion efficiency are not exact physical constants. A professional interpretation separates the clean arithmetic from the uncertainty of the operating session.

  1. Lossless ceiling

    10 h

    Nominal Wh divided by outlet watts. Useful as a ceiling, not as the expected result.

  2. Configured model

    7 h 39 min

    10% reserve and 85% AC efficiency, with the remaining assumptions held fixed.

  3. Conservative check

    Raise the load

    Use the sensitivity comparison below to see how a modest load increase removes hours of runtime.

The largest uncertainty is often the load profile

A nominal 100 W appliance can cycle, throttle or enter standby. For a variable load, measured watt-hours over a representative interval provide a better energy input than a single instantaneous reading. The continuous and startup peaks should still be preserved for the separate output checks.

Evidence: [1] U.S. Department of Energy and NREL

Efficiency is not guaranteed to stay constant

The example holds AC efficiency at 85% so the effect of load is understandable. A real inverter can have different efficiency and idle consumption at different operating points. Product data near the intended load—or a controlled measurement—is stronger evidence than a universal correction factor.

Evidence: [4] Victron Energy

Build a defensible runtime envelope

  • Calculate a typical case from a representative average load.
  • Calculate a conservative case using a justified higher load or lower retained capacity.
  • State the reserve explicitly and do not silently treat the complete nameplate capacity as available.
  • Check continuous and startup output separately; a long runtime does not prove the inverter can start the load.
Download this worksheet

Editorial analysis

Runtime model, bounds and checks

01

Use 10 hours as the lossless upper bound

A 100 W load uses 100 Wh in one hour, so a nominal 1,000 Wh battery divided by 100 W gives ten hours. The units are correct and the calculation is valuable: it establishes the result you could not exceed unless the load is lower than stated or another energy source contributes.

It is not yet an outlet-runtime estimate. Applying a flat 85% conversion factor produces 8.5 hours, or 8 hours 30 minutes—the shortcut many runtime examples publish. Tollica’s 7 hours 39 minutes is lower because the configured plan also stops at a 10% reserve. The difference is a disclosed planning choice, not a conflicting interpretation of watt-hours.

02

A 10% reserve leaves 900 Wh in the selected window

This scenario begins at 100% charge and stops the estimate at 10%, so the charge window is 90 percentage points. Capacity retention is left at 100% for clarity. Multiplying 1,000 Wh by 0.90 gives 900 Wh available to the model.

Reserve is a user decision, not a hidden property of every power station. You might choose a larger buffer for uncertain loads or a smaller one for an occasional non-critical use. Capacity retention is a different input: it represents how much of nominal capacity remains under the assumed condition or age.

03

A 100 W AC load draws more than 100 W from the battery

At 85% AC efficiency, delivering 100 W requires 100 ÷ 0.85, or about 117.65 W, from the battery before any separately entered station overhead. That conversion is why multiplying capacity by efficiency and dividing by load produces the same result when overhead is zero.

Efficiency is not necessarily constant across the inverter’s full power range. A light load may experience a different efficiency than a heavy load, and a station’s own electronics can add a nearly fixed demand. This baseline explicitly sets overhead to zero. Entering 10 W of battery-side overhead changes the calculation to 900 ÷ (117.65 + 10), or about 7.05 hours—approximately 7 hours 3 minutes.

04

Runtime changes linearly only when the other inputs stay fixed

Doubling a constant 100 W load to 200 W approximately halves runtime in this energy model. Doubling capacity approximately doubles it. But those comparisons assume the same battery window, efficiency, retention and overhead. Real products can change efficiency or thermal behavior as load changes.

For cycling equipment such as refrigerators, a 100 W running label is not the same as a 100 W average. Enter running power, duty cycle and off-cycle power, or use a representative measured average. Keep startup demand as a separate output-rating check; a short surge rarely belongs in the hour-by-hour energy total.

  • Use the continuous or representative average load for runtime energy.
  • Use startup demand to check whether the inverter can start the device.
  • Run a conservative scenario when several input values are uncertain.

05

What to verify before relying on the estimate

Confirm whether the 100 W figure is measured at the AC outlet, stated as an input rating, or inferred from an output adapter. Those are not interchangeable. Measure over a representative period when the device changes modes, and record the conditions so the value can be repeated.

Then verify the station’s usable-capacity guidance, inverter efficiency or published runtime examples, continuous output, startup capability and operating-temperature limits. The configured tool link preserves the calculation inputs so another person can inspect the same scenario rather than reverse-engineering a rounded answer.

Ideal versus planned

Calculation laboratory

Why 1,000 ÷ 100 is not the final answer

The ideal division removes every loss and uses the last watt-hour. The planned estimate reserves energy and represents AC conversion explicitly.

01

Ideal label division

10 h

1,000 Wh ÷ 100 W; no reserve or loss

02

Efficiency-only shortcut

8 h 30 min

1,000 Wh × 85% ÷ 100 W; no reserve

03

Battery-side demand

117.65 W

100 W ÷ 85% AC efficiency

04

Planned runtime

7 h 39 min

900 Wh ÷ 117.65 W

Inspect the calculation

Open the 1,000 Wh / 100 W calculation

Loads the 100 W AC scenario with a 1,000 Wh battery, 10% reserve and 85% AC efficiency, then opens the result.

Open configured tool

Clarifications

Questions this guide should leave answered

Use these decision rules to identify the limits that matter, then verify the exact ratings and instructions for your equipment.

Why do some brands use an 80% factor?

It is a simplified combined allowance used in some examples. Tollica keeps reserve, capacity retention, conversion efficiency and station overhead separate so you can replace each assumption instead of inheriting one opaque factor.

Does a 100 W device always consume exactly 100 W?

No. Many devices vary with workload, thermostat state, brightness, charging state or motor cycling. Use a representative measured value or model the operating states explicitly.

Does this runtime prove the station can power the device?

No. Runtime addresses energy. Continuous output, startup demand, voltage, frequency, connector and product restrictions require separate checks.

Traceability

Sources and scope

Each reference is scoped to the nearby claim; source notes state what the reference contributes.

  1. [1] Energy Basics

    U.S. Department of Energy and NREL · Source checked 2026-09-20

    Pages 3, 4 and 11 distinguish energy from power and state E = P × t and P = V × I.

  2. [2] How can I estimate the runtime of my portable power station?

    Jackery Support · Source checked 2026-09-20

    Manufacturer runtime method used as one independent comparison vector, not as a universal efficiency rule.

  3. [3] B80 user manual

    BLUETTI · Source checked 2026-09-20

    Manufacturer example that keeps depth of discharge and conversion efficiency visible in a runtime estimate.

  4. [4] Inverter VE.Direct 230V technical specifications

    Victron Energy · Source checked 2026-09-20

    Manufacturer example showing continuous output, peak power, efficiency and zero-load demand as separate ratings.

Provenance

How this guide was produced

Editorial explanations and deterministic calculations are kept separate. The claim trail identifies which external references support each technical distinction; testing limits are disclosed below.

Editorial owner
Tollica editorial team
Draft checked
2026-09-21
Model
Power Planning Model v1
Model reviewed
14 September 2026

Editorial responsibility

Calculation design, technical synthesis and source mapping

Review scope: Deterministic arithmetic, unit consistency, source scope and calculator-state restoration.

Testing disclosure

No physical product was tested for this guide. Illustrative values are not manufacturer measurements or a product endorsement.

Claim trail

  1. Manufacturer runtime methods treat usable capacity and conversion loss as separate factors.

    [2] Jackery Support · [3] BLUETTI

  2. Continuous power and peak capability do not answer the same question as battery energy.

    [4] Victron Energy

Continue the plan

Planning guidance only. Verify the exact equipment, power station, array and operating conditions before a purchase or connection.